About us

The construction industry is experiencing a dynamic and transformative period of growth.

  • Home
  • FAQs
  • Are Helical Piles More Cost-effective than Traditional Concrete Footings when Considering Total Project Time?
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/

Yes, helical piles are generally more cost-effective than traditional concrete footings when the total project timeline and labor requirements are considered. While the initial material cost per unit may be higher for helical piles, they offer several strategic advantages that reduce the overall project budget and duration:

  • Significant Time Savings: Helical piles can be installed in just 1–2 days and provide immediate load capacity. In contrast, concrete footings require several days for forming and pouring, plus a curing period of 7 to 28 days. Choosing helical piles typically reduces the total project duration by two to three weeks.
  • Reduced Labor and Equipment: Helical piles require minimal digging and less soil disturbance. This eliminates the need for extensive excavation, spoil removal, and the subsequent site restoration often required with concrete footings.
  • Performance in Poor Soil: In Centennial’s expansive clay soils, concrete footings may require expensive over-excavation and engineered fill. Helical piles can be torqued down to stable strata (often 15 to 25 feet deep) more efficiently, providing greater schedule certainty.
  • Lower Quantity Requirements: Because helical piles are highly engineered, projects often require fewer total support points than traditional concrete methods, which helps offset the higher per-unit price.

Related FAQs